Saturday, December 26, 2009
Thursday, December 24, 2009
Our Savior's Born!!! Luke 2:1-20
Tuesday, December 22, 2009
Thursday, December 17, 2009
Government's First Duty...
2nd Amendment Kicks off 2010
Sunday, November 29, 2009
The Cloward-Previn Strategy at Work in America
Inspired by the August 1965 riots in the black district of Watts in Los Angeles (which erupted after police had used batons to subdue a black man suspected of drunk driving), Cloward and Piven published an article titled "The Weight of the Poor: A Strategy to End Poverty" in the May 2, 1966 issue of The Nation. Following its publication, The Nation sold an unprecedented 30,000 reprints. Activists were abuzz over the so-called "crisis strategy" or "Cloward-Piven Strategy," as it came to be called. Many were eager to put it into effect.
In their 1966 article, Cloward and Piven charged that the ruling classes used welfare to weaken the poor; that by providing a social safety net, the rich doused the fires of rebellion. Poor people can advance only when "the rest of society is afraid of them," Cloward told The New York Times on September 27, 1970. Rather than placating the poor with government hand-outs, wrote Cloward and Piven, activists should work to sabotage and destroy the welfare system; the collapse of the welfare state would ignite a political and financial crisis that would rock the nation; poor people would rise in revolt; only then would "the rest of society" accept their demands.
The key to sparking this rebellion would be to expose the inadequacy of the welfare state. Cloward-Piven's early promoters cited radical organizer Saul Alinsky as their inspiration. "Make the enemy live up to their (sic) own book of rules," Alinsky wrote in his 1972 book Rules for Radicals. When pressed to honor every word of every law and statute, every Judaeo-Christian moral tenet, and every implicit promise of the liberal social contract, human agencies inevitably fall short. The system's failure to "live up" to its rule book can then be used to discredit it altogether, and to replace the capitalist "rule book" with a socialist one.
The authors noted that the number of Americans subsisting on welfare -- about 8 million, at the time -- probably represented less than half the number who were technically eligible for full benefits. They proposed a "massive drive to recruit the poor onto the welfare rolls." Cloward and Piven calculated that persuading even a fraction of potential welfare recipients to demand their entitlements would bankrupt the system. The result, they predicted, would be "a profound financial and political crisis" that would unleash "powerful forces … for major economic reform at the national level."
To quote a friend, "Why would BHO single out Detroit for a free handout to people to help pay their utility bills? They will be screaming they need help for next month's bills. If they hand out cash or credit cards, I am willing to bet very few utility bills will be paid with that money. More than a few of those there to get money said they voted for BHO because he said he would take care of them. This is the kind of society he is creating. All take and no give. It will be like the $2,000 handouts after Katrina. People were buying designer purses, etc. You can't make people responsible by giving them everything free. Many of those people have no idea where that money came from. They don't pay taxes and are thumbing their noses at those of us that do." And she had never heard of the Cloward-Previn Strategy, yet she defined the very goals/results of it in that comment.
An article by a young man, Anthony D. Dolpies, about this handout. Again, Cloward-Previn Strategy at work:
The Demoralized victims of more than fifty years of central planning and empty promises came together last week in Michigan. In a scene reminiscent of Soviet style bread lines, more than 65000 people filled out applications, hoping for a share of 15.2 million dollars appropriated by the Obama stimulus pkg to help low income families pay bills, stave off eviction or find temporary housing. Only 3500 people will actually receive aid from the program. This latest incarnation of the Obama recovery act only adds to the evidence that the stimulus was never about job creation, Instead it was merely a tool for the expansion of political power through the welfare state.
The long slow moving lines and ill-prepared city welfare workers agitated the desperate citizens who began to trample and fight one another for a shot at the limited number of applications. This is the end result of Obama’s redistributionist economic policy. Sold under the guise of compassion, social justice, economic justice, egalitarianism, the individual is reduced to a budget item, viewing his fellow man as a threat, competition for his slice of an ever shrinking communal pie.
Redistributionist or socialist policy, call it what you will, can never produce the economic or social equality that those who champion it promise. In fact such a political and economic system only advances the creation of an inescapable binary class system they claim to oppose, the very rich and the very poor. It advocates the notion that the bureaucrat is more equal than equal. The bureaucrat in the welfare state is given the arbitrary authority over the validity of what he views as the needs of the citizen in relation to the immediate needs of the state. In the end redistributionist policy only advances the ultimate immorality, slavery, first by enslaving the producer to the non-producer, then through dependence of the non-producer to the state.
And that's exactly what it is. Slavery. This isn't a black issue, this is an American citizen issue. People are being bought for their vote. People are being enslaved to the welfare system and they don't understand or care about the consequences. They believe that government is going to support them. It doesn't matter where the money comes from, it doesn't matter that they have no desire or instinct to take care of themselves. What has lead to this mentality in a society that has been built on self reliance, pride in accomplishments, and determination to be the one to be responsible for one's own family? At what point did the welfare system become culturally correct? When did the welfare system change from a "safety net" to the entitlement programs of welfare checks, Section 8(a)housing, WIC, AFDC and looked at as being a good thing?
I just finished reading The Big Black Lie How I Learned the Truth about the Democrat Party by Kevin Jackson. What an eye opener to the answers to those questions from someone who lived thru that era of change. He writes:
Growing up, I knew of only one person I can recall who was on welfare, one of our neighbor's oldest daughters. She was a single mother of two children.
When my family spoke of Sandra living on welfare, they would almost whisper that she was 'getting help' It was considered uncouth to speak of government assistance any other way. I remember watching Sandra getting off the bus, carrying sacks of groceries. I later found out that she was too embarrassed to use food stamps at the grocery store in our neighborhood, she would take the bus across town to buy her groceries.He also writes about his upbringing by his grandparents (who raised Kevin and his brother when their mother died at a very young age) and his community:
My own grandparents taught me about personal and financial responsibility, about respect and humility. They taught me the value of hard work, of providing for yourself and your family. To be a welfare recipient was an embarrassment in our community, and those who got it felt ashamed of themselves for needing it.Kevin Jackson is a 45 year old man. The Cloward-Previn Strategy was published in The Nation Magazine, May 2, 1966 issue.
I'd like to encourage you to read the article about the Cloward-Previn Strategy in it's entirety at DiscoverTheNetworks.org, A Guide to the Political Left, to really understand the goals and intentions of the political left and why the comment, "Things are going as planned" makes perfect sense in a world of politics that appears to have just gone insane.
James Simpson, from The American Thinker wrote:
Newsmax rounds out the picture:Their strategy to create political, financial, and social chaos that would result in revolution blended Alinsky concepts with their more aggressive efforts at bringing about a change in U.S. government. To achieve their revolutionary change, Cloward and Piven sought to use a cadre of aggressive organizers assisted by friendly news media to force a re-distribution of the nation's wealth.
Capitalizing on the racial unrest of the 1960s, Cloward and Piven saw the welfare system as their first target. They enlisted radical black activist George Wiley, who created the National Welfare Reform Organization (NWRO) to implement the strategy. Wiley hired militant foot soldiers to storm welfare offices around the country, violently demanding their "rights." According to a City Journal article by Sol Stern, welfare rolls increased from 4.3 million to 10.8 million by the mid-1970s as a result, and in New York City, where the strategy had been particularly successful, "one person was on the welfare rolls... for every two working in the city's private economy."
According to another City Journal article titled "Compassion Gone Mad":The movement's impact on New York City was jolting: welfare caseloads, already climbing 12 percent a year in the early sixties, rose by 50 percent during Lindsay's first two years; spending doubled... The city had 150,000 welfare cases in 1960; a decade later it had 1.5 million.
The vast expansion of welfare in New York City that came of the NWRO's Cloward-Piven tactics sent the city into bankruptcy in 1975. Rudy Giuliani cited Cloward and Piven by name as being responsible for "an effort at economic sabotage." He also credited Cloward-Piven with changing the cultural attitude toward welfare from that of a temporary expedient to a lifetime entitlement, an attitude which in-and-of-itself has caused perhaps the greatest damage of all.
The next time you drive through one of the many blighted neighborhoods in our cities, or read of the astronomical crime, drug addiction, and out-of-wedlock birth rates, or consider the failed schools, strapped police and fire resources of every major city, remember Cloward and Piven's thrill that "...the drain on local resources persists indefinitely."
We knew that Barack Obama was turning DC into a mecca for sucking at the public teat, but it perhaps was not as obvious until recently as to what extent this is occurring. [This] illustrates the depth to which Obama is influenced on “governmentalization” of the private sector. The graphic tells it all:
Unsurprisingly, the low points come during the Democrat(ic) Kennedy, Carter, Clinton and Obama administrations. But the dearth of private sector experience in the Obama cabinet is almost breathtaking. As Nick Schulz notes, “over 90 percent of its prior experience was in the public sector”. Wow.
It shouldn’t be a “wow” moment, though. [This] administration is promoting exactly what we have suspected it would - elimination of private sector industry in favor of government control. From banking to automotive to health care to “net neutrality” - the government takeover is already well under way.
We were great before Barack Obama, and we are now great in spite of him. Don't allow the devious, deceitful promises of security, no matter how well spoken, to be a substitute for the freedoms generations of our predecessors fought and died for.
Saturday, November 28, 2009
The Manhattan Declaration
The unveiling came during a news conference at the National Press Club here in the nation’s capital, but this was a lot more than a photo op. It was a demonstration of solidarity among more than 125 Christians of all denominational stripes that we will not only continue to speak out in the public square, we will continue to stand firm for biblical principles in that public square.
And all I can add to this is IT'S ABOUT TIME!!
Between Oath Keepers and now The Manhattan Declaration I am encouraged as we move into 2010 and get busy rebuilding our party and getting our country safely back under the Constitution.
Friday, October 16, 2009
Obama Controls TV - October 19 - 25
A well laid out plan to infiltrate every single home in the World.
Have your eyes wide open and use wisdom for your family.
From John Nolte:
"On September 10th of this year the Entertainment Industry Foundation (EIF)posted a press release informing the world that “from October 19-25, more than 60 network TV shows [will] spotlight the power and personal benefits of service,” and that this “unprecedented block of TV programming is the first wave of a multi-year ‘I Participate’ campaign.”
^^ Please Read ^^
"My ten-year-old daughter loves “So You Think You Can Dance.” I suspect most eight to eighteen-year-old girls do. So, my question to the producers of this hit show is: “Why are you pointing my daughter to a web page asking her to work at Planned Parenthood?”"
^^ Please Read More^^
"National service and volunteerism is a top priority of both the President and the First Lady. A broad effort has been launched to promote this priority. We’ve seen this in the May 12th White House briefing, the August 10th and 27th art community conference calls, and now in a new effort by the Entertainment Industry Foundation...All of these efforts are driving would-be volunteers to Serve.gov. The question is, for what purpose?"
^^ Yes, There's more ^^
http://tinyurl.com/yzr4jzh
"For the entire week, these and other networks will use our favorite TV shows to shine a spotlight on the power of service. Fifty prime-time shows have already agreed to participate and this number is growing.
Imagine: for seven days straight, whether viewers tune-in to shows like ABCs Extreme Makeover: Home Edition, NBCs 30 Rock, CBSs CSI: Miami or Foxs So You Think You Can Dance they will watch programs infused with inspirational volunteer messages."
Yes.... Just imagine....
List of "Organically" Created iParticipate Television Programs:
President Obama has called for a new era of responsibility. … We can turn up the volume for service and volunteerism, engage more people and make it part of who we are and what we do to bring the country together. …
Campaign Elements: …
“To ‘organically’ create and produce as many shows as possible about service and volunteerism[.] …Ideally storylines will touch on one or more of the key issues that have outlined as the country’s top priorities for services:
- Education and children
- Health and well being
- Environmental conservation and reduced energy consumption
- Economic development and financial security
- support for military families
From the iParticipate website:
Check Out All The Participating Shows! Find Out How Your Favorites Are Taking Part.
By iParticipate on Tue, Oct 13 2009, 18:11:41
Below are some of the shows taking part in EIF’s iParticipate campaign, and what they plan to do. (A “tag” means an in show announcement or promotion.)
Show……………………………………..Participation
ABC
America’s Funniest Home Videos…………Segment
Brothers and Sisters…………………………Script, tag
Castle……………………………………………Tag
Cougar Town…………………………………..Tag
Dancing With the Stars……………………..Segment, tag
Desperate Housewives………………………Script, tag
Eastwick………………………………………..Tag
Extreme Makeover: Home Edition………..Story line, tag
Grey’s Anatomy……………………………….Script, tag
Hank……………………………………………..Tag
Modern Family…………………………………Tag
Private Practice………………………………..Script, tag
Scrubs……………………………………………Tag
The Forgotten…………………………………..Script, tag
Ugly Betty……………………………………….Script, tag
All My Children………………………………….Script, tag
General Hospital………………………………..Script, tag
One Life to Live…………………………………Script, tag
The View………………………………………….Segment, tag
Jimmy Kimmel Live!…………………………..Segment, tag
NBC
30 Rock…………………………………………..Script, tag
Access Hollywood………………………………Segment, tag
Community………………………………………Script, tag
Heroes…………………………………………….Script, tag
Parks and Recreation………………………….Script, tag
The Biggest Loser………………………………Segment, tag
The Jay Leno Show……………………………Segment, tag
The Office………………………………………..Script, tag
Today……………………………………………..Segment, tag
CBS
Accidentally on Purpose………………………Tag
Cold Case………………………………………..Script, tag
Criminal Minds…………………………………..Script, tag
CSI: Crime Scene Investigation…………….Script, tag
CSI: Miami……………………………………….Script, tag
CSI: NY…………………………………………..Script, tag
Gary Unmarried…………………………………Script, tag
Ghost Whisperer………………………………..Script, tag
How I Met Your Mother……………………….Script, tag
NCIS………………………………………………Script, tag
NCIS: Los Angeles…………………………….Tag
The New Adventures of Old Christine……..Tag
Numb3rs…………………………………………Script, tag
Rules of Engagement…………………………Script, tag
The Big Bang Theory………………………….Tag
The Mentalist……………………………………Tag
Two and a Half Men……………………………Tag
Late Show With David Letterman…………..Segment, tag
FOX
America’s Most Wanted………………………Segment, tag
Bones……………………………………………..Tag
Brothers………………………………………….Script, tag
COPS……………………………………………..Segment, tag
Lie to Me………………………………………….Script, tag
Major League Baseball………………………..Script,tag
So You Think You Can Dance?……………..Segment, tag
’Til Death…………………………………………Script, tag
The Wanda Sykes Show……………………..Future segment, tag
The CW
I Pledge…………………………………………..Committed
Nickelodeon
TeenNick HALO Awards………………………Segment, tag
WeTV
The Locator……………………………………..Tag
My Fair Wedding……………………………….Tag
Lifetime
Army Wives……………………………………..Future story line
Project Runway…………………………………Tag
Rita Rocks……………………………………….Tag
Sherri……………………………………………..Tag
BET
The Mo’Nique Show…………………………..Tag
Disney Channel
Wizards of Waverly Place……………………Script
Sonny With a Chance…………………………Script
Hannah Montana……………………………….Script
The Suite Life on Deck………………………..Script
CNN
American Morning……………………………..Segment
Showbiz Tonight: HLN………………………..Segment
CMT
CMT Top 20 Countdown………………………Segment
CMT Insider………………………………………Segment
Syndicated Shows
The Dr. Oz Show……………………………….Tag
Dr. Phil……………………………………………Segment(s), public service announcement
Entertainment Tonight / The Insider……….Segment, tag
Extra: The Entertainment Magazine……….Tag
Jerry Springer…………………………………..Tag
Judge Jeanine Pirro……………………………Tag
Judge Mathis…………………………………….Tag
Maury……………………………………………..Tag
Thursday, October 1, 2009
Is There A Doctor In The House??
The liberals rant that the Republicans have their hands deep in the insurance company pockets. But the Democrats have theirs equally as deep in the pharmaceutical & trial lawyer pockets. How the Democrats can look American in the eye and say this has been a bipartisan effort on their part just floors me. To my knowledge not one Republican amendment has made it through. Not one. I know Senator Olympia Snowe (R) ME is their poster child for their gracious bipartisan spirit, but she's one of our finest RINO's who has one foot almost crossed over into Democrat devotion. Arlan Spector comes to mind. Anyway, we know the politicians aren't going to put down their games and my concern is who is going to listen to our doctors?
During the 9/12 March on Washington there were hundreds of doctors who took part. There wasn't any news coverage, of course, but I'd like to point them out here.
From Docs4PatientCare:
Practicing US physicians uniting to represent the interests and concerns of both patients and doctors in the healthcare reform debate. D4PC endorses the concept of needed healthcare reform, but we recognize it can only be accomplished by proceeding in a cautious and responsible manner. Our recommendations will enable us to reach this goal without requiring the nationalization of the entire American healthcare system.
Docs4PatientCare Proposed Alternatives for Effective Healthcare Reform:
- There is no logical reason to hastily pass this legislation by a predetermined deadline. We have one chance to get this right.
- Bring "all" stakeholders together to help assure a meaningful and sustainable reform by considering many recommendations and proposals.
- Adopt a patient-centered approach to healthcare reform that empowers patients and promotes freedom of choice.
- Use the power of government to assist the uninsured obtain health coverage through modification of the tax code, such as tax credits and vouchers.
- Reduce high insurance premiums by opening up patient risk pools across the entire nation, thereby diffusing risk.
- Allow the individual/family to be the "owner" of the policy making their health care coverage portable and available if they lose their job or move to a new place of employment. This will eliminate exclusion from the new employer's plan for a “pre-existing” health issue and also eliminate a waiting period to qualify for enrollment.
- Encourage and expand Health Savings Accounts. Tax-Free savings vehicle for planned and/or unexpected medical expenses.
- Tort Reform. The costs to our healthcare system secondary to the practice of defensive medicine are over $100 billion annually, or $2,000 per family.
- Insurance Reform. Guarantee insurability due to pre-existing illness. Eliminate Insurance company antitrust exemption.
They had their own Doctors Against Obamacare Rally in Washington.
The report from Looking at the Left by El Marco:
September 10, 2009, Washington, D.C.
Today doctors, nurses and other medical professionals came to Washington, D.C. from across the country to show their opposition to Obamacare. This rally exploded the government-created myth that there is unanimity amongst health care professionals for Democrat plans to take over health care. The Association of American Physicians and Surgeons came to D.C. to present a petition from doctors to lawmakers. The AAPS has been a voice for private physicians since 1943. Their motto is Omani pro aegroto, “all for the patient”. The doctors met with the representatives from their respective states and argued for a platform that avoids unnecessary bureaucratic intervention in health care.
Dr. Shannon Norris, a radiologist from Atlanta, holds a People's Cube poster describing Obamacare as offering “the efficiency of the Postal Service, the sustainability of Social Security and all the compassion of the IRS”.
Dr. Steven Ellison, a cardiologist from Georgia, displays graphically how doctors feel about being targeted by a party and president that slander and demonize them. On the podium, speaker after speaker talked about the slurs President Obama has made about doctors performing unnecessary amputations and tonsillectomies out of greed. Not only is it untrue that doctors profit from these procedures, but the premise that they would do such harm to their patients is an insult to doctors.
Dr. Hal Scherz, a pediatric urologist from Atlanta, founded Docs for Patient Care to voice doctors’ opposition to the “big rush” for a big government solution to health care reform. The organization of doctors suggests practical proposals such as tort reform, insurance reform, and opening up insurance pools between states.
Their petition to Congress can be found at TakeBackMedicine.com:
Physicians can no longer allow medical care in this country to be controlled by government and insurance companies
Current reform options purport to be “cure-alls” for every American. But we know that every patient is different, and just like patients, there is no single big-government solution to change health care in this country.
Instead, we need more diversity in solutions. Therefore, I support changes that address the following issues:
Petition point: 1. INDEPENDENCE: Doctors are professionals. They answer to their patients, not the government or an insurance company or any other third party. Treatments should be decided by doctor and patient exclusively.
Petition point: 2. VALUE OUR SERVICES: Physicians have a right to be paid a market-based fee for their services, and to be paid at the time of service or within a reasonable period.
Dr. Lovitt: “Patients, we will cover your backs if you do not tie our hands behind our backs.”
Petition point 3. DOCTORS ARE NOT INSURANCE BILLING CLERKS: Physicians should not be forced to act as billing or collection agents for third-parties, whether private insurance or the government.
Petition point 4. REGULATIONS GET BETWEEN PHYSICIANS & PATIENTS: Excessive regulatory burden on physicians is interfering with patient care. We must decrease regulations, not pass more.
Petition point 5. LIABILITY COSTS MUST BE REDUCED: Costly defensive treatment and tests, and predatory litigation result in excessive liability costs for physicians and patients alike.
Petition point 6. AUTONOMY: Neither physicians nor patients should be forced to participate in government nor private health care plans or programs.
Petition point 8. PRIVACY: Physicians must not be forced to disclose patient records without the express consent of patients.
Dr. Phil Gingery, U.S. Congressman from Georgia addresses the Rally.
Howard Long, from Pleasanton, California is “a country doctor.”
The basic question comes down to who do you want making your health care decisions. Do you want them made in a doctor’s office with men like these? Or do you want them made by bureaucrats and congressional ”staffers.”
The battle is still going on..
You can hear all of the speeches from the rally here:
http://event.playonsports.com/widget.html?eventId=6843